Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mavatar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Mavatar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Founded in 2011, this company has a Web site with an Alexa ranking of 292,974 in its home country and 757,999 globally and offers (since this 22 February) a free Ipad app that has not yet received any reviews within the Itunes store. I searched Google News and its archives  but didn't find other coverage there. The bizjournals.com story cited in the article seems to be based on information from a press release. &mdash; rybec   07:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete:
 * The Bis Journals source is about the chairman not the company itself.
 * MCommerce source is definitely about the company.
 * Huffington post reference is an employee being interviewed by the Huffington Post so is not independent of the company and can be discounted in terms of establishing notability.
 * Mention in the PC magazine article doesn't meet the requirements of WP:CORDEPTH as it is being included in a list along with others.
 * Women 2.0 article is about the creator of Mavatar not the company itself.
 * Notability, per WP:GNG & WP:ORG is not established in the article through sources which are independent and provide depth. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.