Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mavelstone Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Mavelstone Road

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

tagged this for notability a couple of months ago. I'm inclined to conclude, after assessing the cited sources and undertaking a search for myself that this fails GNG. I'm opting for an AFD as opposed to a PROD due to the esoteric nature of WP:GEOROAD, so I'm community input on this proposal.  SITH   (talk)   16:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't find the claim in the article that the road notable because it is unpaved to meet the WP definition of notability. Furthermore, the bulk of the article seems to be OR. MB 18:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Most roads don't have separate WP articles (see Notability (streets, roads, and highways) and User:Grutness/One street per 50,000 people) and there's nothing to suggest that this is notable. It does come up in passing mention in Google Books. Stotfold (house) on it probably wouldn't be a suitable target to merge to.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 18:06, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability.  Not written in way suitable for WP.  Britishfinance (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.