Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mavie Österreicher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 08:10, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Mavie Österreicher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NSPORT. Kleuske (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Passes WP:NTENNIS, and a quick WP:BEFORE search (which I suspect the nom didn't do given that they nominated only 5 minutes after creation) found some good looking German language sources. Iffy★Chat -- 08:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Such as? I read German and (even after a second BEFORE check) found nothing but a few passing mentions. If you have sources, cite them. Do not expect others to take your word for it. Kleuske (talk) 07:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep (is that allowed?) Passes WP:NTENNIS because of participation in a WTA main draw (criterion 3). Sportsfan77777 (talk) 06:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * NTennis#3: "Have competed in the main draw in one of the highest level professional tournaments" (emphasis mine). Ramskogler was had a wildcard entry there (not the main draw), so she fails that criterion. Kleuske (talk) 07:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * While you're right that singles qualifying doesn't count for NTENNIS, the doubles main draw does (This guideline applies equally to singles and doubles players). SNGs have bright lines to avoid the kind of arguments we're having right now. Iffy★Chat -- 08:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment, since the objections above are copy-pasted from Articles for deletion/Nadja Ramskogler (or vice-versa), I'll just follow suit. Kleuske (talk) 07:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NTENNIS and tennis project guidelines. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as she appears to meet the WP:NTENNIS requirements for doubles players. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or draftify as she is an unsourced WP:BLP/fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  talk  22:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment a quick Google search yields quite a good amount of non-English news sources. This article needs a bit of help, but not deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 23:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to keep the article if it's properly referenced, but it's problematic as it stands. SportingFlyer  talk  23:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NTENNIS #3. gidonb (talk) 02:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.