Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Bretos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 02:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Max Bretos

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I nominated this areticle for deletion because it is nonsense and he hasn't been with the WWE long enough to have a Wikipedia page. Clay4president2 21:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. At least let someone (watch, it will end up being me) expand this article; Max Bretos is well known among American soccer fans and a section on his broadcasting career for Major League Soccer and on Fox Soccer Channel is warranted.  As is, yes, this article doesn't meet notability, but the subject in question possesses other merits besides working for WWE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Roehl Sybing (talk • contribs) 22:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Comment: I just added relevant information that relates to his soccer broadcasting career. This should at least make the article noteworthy.  And yes, I forgot to sign last time, so --> Roehl Sybing 03:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep He may be new in WWE, but his soccer broadcastin career is somewhat notable. TJ Spyke 02:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. His broadcasting career overall isn't that notable. If he remains on Raw longer, the article could be re-created I suppose. RobJ1981 02:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It needs expanding and citations, but his presence on Raw provides notabilityBalloonman 05:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Much as I despise pro wrestling, it's pretty well established (as per WP:BIO) that any professional athlete who's competed at the highest level in his sport is notable, so I think deleting this would seem a bit biased.--Djrobgordon 06:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep As a TV personality on a larger channel, he is notable. As a sportsman who has played at the highest level nationally, he is notable. Notability doesn't seem to be the problem here, maybe just mainstream knowledge of him. Poeloq 10:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Why does it matter how long he's been in WWE? Notable, previous career, etc. Keep. - Denny 18:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Strongly passes Notability and verfiablility SirFozzie 19:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely room for improvement, but ye, he seems fairly notable. Govvy 23:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.