Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Lyon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 19:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Max Lyon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Non-notable amateur athlete, does not meet WP:ATHLETE, insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Esprqii (talk) 18:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - league is semi-pro at best (they are associated with a semi-pro and an amateur league and both of those may not even be notable associations), and there is really nothing in the way of sources after a search. As for the sources currently in the article, the GT is so trivial of coverage, the Oregonian ones I could not even find on that paper's website (the non-footnoted one to OregonLive does not mention Lyon at all), and the ones to his league are obviously not independent. Utterly non-notable under WP:BIO or WP:NOTE. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Completely un-notable per above. Looks as if someone knows him and wants him on Wikipedia.  A ML-Talk-Cont-Count
 * Delete per the above. Pretty clear case- if Lyon becomes notable in the future, great. Not notable now, though. tedder (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable player in a non-notable baseball "league". — X96lee15 (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Some guy in a senior "baseball" league is not even close to being notable.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 03:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't come close to meeting any of Wikipedia's notability criteria. We don't have articles for everyone who's name has ever appeared in the newspaper.  BRMo (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.