Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Pawlus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 17:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Max Pawlus

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced, no GHits. May be a hoax. Visor (talk) 13:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.   —Visor (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.   —Visor (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - nomination shows unfortunate systemic bias problems - David Gerard (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - if any source can be found just to show he existed, he meets notability. But the fact that he doesn't appear in any of the Eurobasket databases concerns me. matt91486 (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, can't find any sources outside of a one line wikipedia page with inadiquate sourcing. Really unshure how WP:CSB applyes in this case...a polish native, nominates a polish basketball players page for deletion because it dosn't have any sourcing and he is demographicly inclined to be bias toward the deletion somehow?Coffeepusher (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and others above.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Addhoc (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article shows unfortunate unverifiability bias problems. --Dragonfiend (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per Speedy-Point 7. Wiki-nightmare (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.