Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxacapan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Maxacapan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see how an ejido deserves an article. For one, it's just a co-op community, not an established city or town. The article says that the town is known for its snails which are actually found in Laguna Catemaco. I say delete or merge with a better article. (Laguna Catemaco) Undead Warrior (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Comment I could see a merge, but I don't think delete is a good idea. The community is mentioned here, "Maxacapan, ubicada 6 kilómetros al sudoeste de la cabecera municipal 990 habitantes. dedicados a la ganadería, pesca y agricultura." ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - okay, not sure about the quality of the sources, but it seems to be a separate settlement within the administrative district of Catemaco. see for instance.  Catemaco covers 700 square km, which is much larger than typical cities in many places, This map also shows them as separate settlements. Wily D  14:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep appears from the available source to be a village. The village also constitutes an economic community, a cooperative. Nonetheless, it eetains the political nature of being a distinct settlement. DGG (talk) 01:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.