Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxime Lachaud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No arguments to keep - treating as an uncontested PROD Kevin (talk) 22:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Maxime Lachaud

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Highly promotional text regarding an individual about whom multiple independent sources are glaringly lacking. Fails WP:BIO. Biruitorul Talk 14:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Comment Gees, I don't know... I mean, seeing the picture there it almost seems like a prank or joke but I need to remind myself not to judge based on that... Let's see, I can't find much either, but shall we try and be fair and get a French speaker in on this? Turqoise127 (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I speak French, and judge it likely that this person exists, if perhaps only as a pseudonym of somebody else, even though the article reads like a parody of a biography of a certain kind of European intellectual. There are books published under that name, e.g. . But the article is mainly an exercise in self-promotion, and neither it nor a Google search reveals any substantial coverage of the person, as opposed to works by him. This makes him fail WP:BIO.  Sandstein   19:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.