Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxime Tanguay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 17:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Maxime Tanguay

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable junior player who fails WP:ATHLETE as he has yet to play professionally. Can be readded when/if he plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability. Prod removed was mistaken in his edit message that the player meeds the WP:HOCKEY player notability guidelines as major-junior hockey is not professional. Djsasso (talk) 03:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   —Djsasso (talk) 03:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable am player, fails WP:ATHLETE.  Grsz  11  03:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's true that I misread WP:HOCKEY/PPF (In my head, I somehow merged "Played five or more seasons, and at least 100 games" from one line with "in a major junior league such as the Ontario Hockey Association" of the following line) but it still meets WP:N with sufficient Reliable Sources for a V, NPOV, NOR article. Double Blue  (talk) 04:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per the same reasons I indicated when I prod'd this. Fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE. – Nurmsook!  talk...  06:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also...notability is not inherited. The sources in the article seem to be based on the fact that he is his brother's brother. WP:ATHLETE is the one that matters here, since he is an athlete and the articles linked apply to his being an athlete. As he does not meet WP:ATHLETE, he is not notable. --Smashvilletalk 06:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete QMJHL is not pro, fails WP:ATHLETE. ccwaters (talk) 14:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. GoodDay (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.