Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximilian de Suarez d’Aulan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Maximilian de Suarez d’Aulan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability for this particular current representative of an noble house  DGG ( talk ) 09:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, nearly unsourced article about an 18 year old student with no claim to notability outside of his family connection. Most of this article, and the unsourced BLP article about his father Patrick de Suarez d'Aulan, consist mainly of rambling, unsourced family history, probably from De Suarez d'Aulan and its doppelganger De Suarez d’Aulan, which were deleted three times between them following a deletion discussion. WP:Articles for deletion/Patrick de Suarez d'Aulan was closed with no consensus.Capewearer (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * All information is gathered and summarized from the historical novel " Un fil dans le Tapis, histoire des Suarez d'Aulan ", editions Karthala, Juin 2009, ISBN 978-2-8111-0228-9. The last chapter speaks of the future 12th Marquis, Maximilian. Everything can be fact checked in the novel and it's sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henry.Ewood (talk • contribs) 19:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTINHERITED applies in a literal sense here. The article contains hardly any biographical content, much less a credible claim of notability—it's just unsourced family history that was copy-pasted from Patrick de Suarez d'Aulan. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * delete, there's nothing about him that's really worth a page. also - hard agree with henry, the article on his father reads very very messily. i think we should delete that page too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vernyeds (talk • contribs) 23:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete being an heir to displaced royalty is not a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Being the displaced heir of a cadet family of a deposed royal house is too tenuous a claim to notability for inclusion. He's done nothing, not even philanthropy. Even if everything is true, he's a very common nobleman. Bearian (talk) 01:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.