Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxims on authoritarianism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 02:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Maxims on authoritarianism
While my initial feeling was that there could be a notable article written on this subject, I think this is just unsalvagable original research. Cheapestcostavoider 00:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- I agree. The El Reyko 00:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Probably original research/essay. - Richardcavell 01:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would prefer to see it merged, but it's completely unreferenced. Tyrenius 01:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral; very weak keep pending sources. On second thought... nah, let's BJAODN it if sources aren't forthcoming.
 * Delete. Some sort of orginal research essay. Not funny enough for BJAODN. DarthVad e r 02:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing to see here. Agree with nom that the idea is sound but the execution is not.--Deville (Talk) 03:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unencyclopædic collection of unsourced, uncited quotations. Useless to a researcher.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. --Ter e nce Ong 08:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Arnzy (Talk) 08:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or BJAODN per User:Richardcavell. J I P  | Talk 09:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; seems more like an article in sorry need of citations than original research. Also the style is not very encyclopedic, so it could use stylistic editing. But simply needing clean-up isn't grounds enough for deletion. --Ginkgo100 17:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  20:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.