Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximum-Football


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was S-Keep. Improper nomination. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 07:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Maximum-Football

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

If this page is just going to be used as a platform for vandilizem, it might as well not be here. Diverman2008 (talk) 06:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep A decent article, though it could use some improvements. Just because it gets vandalized like every other article on Wikipedia at times doesn't mean it needs to be deleted.  Jmlk  1  7  06:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: That's not a reason for delation. Just watchlist the article, and ask some other editors to do the same. Redrocket (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - It would be a decent article yes if people would leave it alone. If it were a once in a blue moon problem I would aggree with Jmlk, however, it's a continual problem and includes personal attacks. At that point it does more harm than anything else. Thank you for your opinions. --Diverman2008 (talk) 06:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and Close invalid reason for nomination. Vandalism is not a reason to delete. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 06:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, I agree with Daniel J. Leivick. Also, encouraging others to watchlist the article and watch it for vandalism is a far better idea than deleting it. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 06:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Vandal magnet is reason for protection, not deletion. Doczilla  STOMP! 06:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.