Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximum pain theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The article is not properly sourced and seems to truly be a form of neologism. JodyBtalk 13:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Maximum pain theory

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This seems to be a combination of advertisement, neologism and nonsense. Busy Stubber 01:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you, DumbBOT! :)) --Busy Stubber 22:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment Today a user added a new comment to the article's talk page, so please consider that comment. Maybe he doesn't know how to put the comment here. I don't understand what he's talking about, but maybe you do. Thank you. --Busy Stubber 00:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely unsourced.Biophys 02:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rubbish. 12.118.190.10 (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, for now. The article is certainly a mess, but I'm not convinced that deletion is the right course of action.  I found a couple of sources  suggesting that this is a legitimate concept in options trading.  It may well be a neologism or advertising, but I think we would benefit from more people taking a look at this - preferably people with some knowledge in the area.-- Kubigula (talk) 15:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be a blatant advertisement. I'd say speedy and tag it db-spam but it's a little late for that now. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.