Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May Be


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  22:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

May Be

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable sailing boat Thetrick (talk) 23:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to probability. This would seem to be a non-notable private yacht.  I am reminded, though, of the profound philosophical discussion alluded to in Gilbert and Sullivan's Princess Ida. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * May Be Deleted as a self-reference. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 16:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - The boat does exist but it's claim to notability has no reliable sources. --Pmedema (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  13:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete tried and failed to verify the sole possible claim to notabiluty, that of participating in the first Tall Ships race. If that can be proven it *might* be notable. Vessel name is almost an impossible search, see foe example TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - A yacht of the 1920s and still apparently operating is probably old enough to be notable, as is is use by Rommel during WWII. The problem with the article is that its only source is a website, presumably derived from its present owner, is a self-published source, and needs better verification.  Tag as inadequately sourced.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – The lack of independent sources is troubling, but less so than the WP:COI; the sole significant editor being . Seems intended mostly as an ad for a marginally notable boat. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.