Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The status of the refocus stands unchallenged Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

May House

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I feel it's no more notable than any one of the hundreds of skyscrapers in the city. No sources Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 09:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - I would've thought its being police headquarters makes it a bit different from any other skyscraper? Deryck C. 12:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment I have moved the May House article to make it part of the larger and until this move not yet existing Hong Kong Police Headquarters article. This article as a whole is now a stub and the notability of the topic should not be controversial. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable and per Deryck. Jeremy Hopkins (talk) 14:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 02:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.