Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Hanoomanjee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. The nominator didn't provide a reason for deletion (WP:SK #1). --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Maya Hanoomanjee

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Better create a fan page on a social networking site. Day000Walker (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Being a cabinet minister in a national government is notable. The nominator has provided no valid reason for deletion. Pburka (talk) 16:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Keep. The nominator has brought this and other articles to AfD within an hour of creation . A Google search shows ample coverage readily available. I'll go through it and try to source the article. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The link already in the article provides enough proof to satisfy WP:POLITICIAN as a member of parliament and a government minister. RS coverage (such as here and here) confirm notability even if they concentrate on one controversy. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I am weary of nominations that do not provide any rationale for deletion or supply any deletion criterion. I wish such nominations could be speedy closed. If the nominator is unwilling or unable to provide an argument I do not see why others should inconvenienced. Good night. Thincat (talk) 22:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.