Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaybeKnot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

MaybeKnot
tagged for speedy but there is (inexplicably) no WP:CSD criterion for vanispamcruftisement, so you good people get to judge it instead. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 14:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 14:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. No Alexa data.  Not even first hit for its own name in Google search.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-01 15:02Z 
 * Delete per all above. PJM 15:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and how about we lobby for/seek concensus on a rule change? This article should be speediable in my humble opinion. --kingboyk 19:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per everyone. Even if it did help me learn a new word with "vanispamcruftisement" : ). Adrian Lamo · (talk)  · (mail) · 20:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.