Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayfair, Raipur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Mayfair, Raipur

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotion Page does no meet to WP:GNG Rohit5001849W (talk) 08:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC) striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Rohit5001849W (talk) 08:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chhattisgarh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter Southwood (talk): 10:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as a publicity-piece. Even the reference from Mayfair, Raipur just says that a group of politicians stayed there. Joyous! | Talk 19:12, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no architectural or historical significance. The advertorial-style articles promoting this hotel don't convince me of its notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree, no indications of notability.  HighKing++ 11:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW, WP:SPAM, WP:TNT, and User:Bearian/Standards. The consensus appears to be that this is spam for a hotel. It badly fails my long-standing standards; for example, no paper of record or notable tour guides have reviewed it, it is not in a major city or resort town, the architecture is ordinary, it's not old, and it's not in prime real estate. The hotel is part of a chain. It's hosted a single major wedding. Right now, it seems as if a middle school student wrote it, using qualitative rather than quantifiable language. If it were kept, it would have to be 100 % re-written to be an encyclopedia article. Bearian (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.