Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 21:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Mayian

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

All WP:OR and unsourced. Better to start from the beginning. Possibly not even a Sikh tradition, according to an ip. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of sources here, including many describing this as a Sikh tradition. Even if it is thought better to start from the beginning that doesn't require an admin to hit the "delete" button first. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  09:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ISBN 9788178357218 pp. 219 is one source that confirms quite a lot of this content as-is. So not only is this not original research, it is not even necessary to start from the beginning.  ISBN 9780706983685 has a maiyan on page 29, which seems to be a related part of the overall ceremony, if not the simple alternative spelling of the name that ISBN 9781858563534 pp. 73 indicates it to be.  This seems to be an article on a subject where evidently there's at least as much as is already in this article right now to write.  Keep. Uncle G (talk) 01:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Some references could definitely be found for this article, and after that it'd be fine. Endofskull (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.