Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor Max I


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mayor Max II. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Mayor Max I

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I redirected this to Mayor Max II for lack of notability, but was reverted because somehow the "official" mayor max site establishes that notability. While "2" got probably enough attention to warrant an article, I don't see the same for "1" and a mention or short paragraph in the "2" article seems sufficient, so I again propose redirecting this. Fram (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Politics,  and California. Fram (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: note sourcing for Max I in articles and .  Iseult   Δx parlez moi 07:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yes, some very local sources exist. The second one is a passing mention, the first one is really about Max. Fram (talk) 07:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the place has no government, so essentially the opening of the article is false. This is a publicity stunt, it has no encyclopedic value. This dog was not a mayor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mayor Max II per nom. Subject is not independently notable per WP:GNG, so a standalone article isn't justified. Sal2100 (talk) 22:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.