Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazda 6

Not even a substub. Incomprehensible numbers, virtually no salvageable content. If somebody wants to write an article about this car, fine, but this isn't it. Delete. Lupo 12:14, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, somebody has rewritten it. It's now a decent stub. Keep now, and remove this entry from VfD. Lupo 07:37, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * While it's definitely a substub that deserves deletion (if not rewritten), but I don't see what's incomprehensible about the numbers. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 14:49, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Substub. Delete unless rewritten by the end of VFD. Can always be recreated when someone who knows something about the car comes along. DJ Clayworth 16:15, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep new version. DJ Clayworth 22:00, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * There's nothing here short of the engine's output. Even a "B-Movie Bandit" substub is more informative than this.  Delete unless rewritten.  These specs are easily obtainable through magazines and the 'net if anyone wants to attempt a real article later. - Lucky 6.9 17:46, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Technically, this could have been a speedy as a substub (which it was of course), but for Pete's sake it's only a day old. The Mazdaphiliac anon who's doing these is delivering good (albeit US-centric) articles, seems to me even cleanup would have been premature. I have stubified, as 2003 European Car of the Year it certainly should have an article. Andrewa 20:50, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep new stub. Looking great. - Lucky 6.9 21:30, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep re-written stub. Wikipedia is not paper. --Goobergunch 23:16, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep rewritten stub. Good job, Andrewa. Lupo 07:37, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep Denni &#9775; 02:03, 2004 Jul 11 (UTC)
 * Keep - still slim, but certainly no slimmer than half the other auto pages! --Sfoskett 18:51, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)