Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazraeh-ye Baqr Sheybani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Mazraeh-ye Baqr Sheybani

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only AFD'ing this because somehow this was prodded and deprodded before. This is a farm, and not a village as the article claims. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 16:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 16:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Also please take a look at Mazraeh-ye Moruji. Thanks. -- VersaceSpace  🌃 16:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete both just because a gazeteer somewhere lists every farm and well in a country does not mean we need articles on all of them.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete both - The name Mazraeh-ye Baqr Sheybani literally means "Baghershibani farm", and the other name also literally just means "Meroji Farm". It is not a legally-recognised populated place, simply being listed as an abadi on the Iranian census is not evidence of being such since the Iranian census is not a listing of legally-recognised populated places but instead a listing of local features around which the population has been counted. Explicit (or whoever closes this) please review the consensuses around Carlossuarez46's mass-created articles here (and also in the links on the same page): Arbitration/Requests/Case/Carlossuarez46. This whole thing has been discussed many times, with ultimately clear consensuses against, so it is not clear to me why this could not have been closed as delete based on the first vote. FOARP (talk) 10:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.