Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazzoth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Passover, with history intact. Whether, what, and where to merge is, as always, an editorial decision. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Mazzoth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a WP:POVFORK of Passover. Presents a theory on the origin of Passover which could be incorporated in a section of that article and results in a situation in which academic viewpoints are in one article and religious viewpoints in another, which the WP:POVFORK guideline is designed to prevent. --Shirahadasha 22:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.   —Shirahadasha 23:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible/Biblical criticism work group.  --Shirahadasha 23:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete The first half of the article is a summary of the Biblical commandments concering Passover; the second, as the nominator wrote, is Biblical criticism. Anything of value here that isn't already in Passover should be merged, and this article deleted. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 23:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note that after a merge, a redirect is necessary to preserve author data in compliance with the GFDL. Stifle (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Matzo article. IZAK 08:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Matzo if anyone want to merge they can find it in the history. Jon513 09:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Matzo/Passover. Stifle (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The article states that its subject is a holiday, not a food item, so Passover rather than Matzo would appear to be the more logical merge. Best, --Shirahadasha 20:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think they mean to say merge to passover and redirect to matzo. Jon513 10:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.