Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McCann v UK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

McCann v UK

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article does not establish why the case is significant. Ethanlu121 (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

❌ Ethanlu121 (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Legal cases published by the highest court of a jurisdiction and cases that set binding precedent within a jurisdiction are generally considered notable and worthy of inclusion in this encyclopedia. In this case, we are dealing with a decision by the European Court of Human Rights, which sets binding precedent for the Court of Justice of the European Union. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.