Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McClatchy Interactive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirects are cheap, no valid reason to delete given. Johnleemk | Talk 11:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

McClatchy Interactive
Delete, since the mention of this subdivision in The McClatchy Company seems more than enough. As it stands, the subdivision page is both of substub quality, and borders on vanity (if you consider it on its own and not as a subdivision) to my taste. BACbKA 14:43, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:26, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. &mdash; mark &#9998; 11:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Mo0 [ talk ] 04:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete superfluous, per above Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 21:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The McClatchy Company. Doesn't need it's own article, but should be redirected not deleted as it will discourage recreation and allow people to find parent company when looking by this name. -- JLaTondre 18:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * When searching by name, the article will show up anyway. There will not be a flood of hits btw ;-) As for the recreation, an ignorant user will still be able come up with a creative spelling you miss anyway, w/o researching about the parent article (capitalisation variations, Company vs Co., or smth else...) --BACbKA 15:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * P.S. And, since it is a vanity and self-promo, I predict that recreation will not happen by non-affiliated parties. --BACbKA 15:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirects are cheap. Your last statement is exactly why I mentioned "discourage recreation". -- JLaTondre 18:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.