Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McClintock (disambiguation)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirected to McClintock. FCYTravis 6 July 2005 00:03 (UTC)

McClintock (disambiguation)
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "unnecessary disambig page - articles have two differnt titles". McClintock is already a disambig page.  &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 01:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Useful disambiguation page. Pburka 02:18, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Since McClintock is already a disambig page, what is the purpose of McClintock (disambiguation)?   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't understand the reason for the nomination. 23skidoo 02:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: What don't you understand about it? It's a redundant and pointless disambig.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This nomination appears to be incorrect. It points at McClintock when the nominated page is actually McClintock (disambiguation). I vote to keep McClintock and delete McClintock (disambiguation). Pburka 03:18, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Fixed now. Yes, the fate of McClintock is not at issue here.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - As said, disambig page already exists at McClintock. -- Cabhan 05:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is no point here. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 06:03, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to McClintock seems simpler, but Delete is OK too. -Eisnel 09:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unnecessary with McClintock already a dab. Double Blue  (Talk) 14:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep . Redirect to McClintock. There is, I have discovered, a very good reason to keep "Foo (disambiguation)" pages that point at "Foo", which happens to be a disambig page - it makes it easier to sort out and clean up erroneous links to disambig pages, by setting aside instances where the link is actually intended to point to the disambig. -- BD2412 talk 16:54, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
 * Redirect to McClintock. &mdash; RJH 18:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.