Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McFee Bridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to British Columbia Highway 95A. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

McFee Bridge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet general notability guidelines. Found reliable references to it mention it only trivially, in passing. Air.light (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  21:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to British Columbia Highway 95A of which this bridge forms a part. SpinningSpark 21:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: This (page 3) is the most detailed source I could find (a one paragraph photo caption). Chris857 (talk) 00:21, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge to highway per Spinningpark. Bridges are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — for a bridge to qualify for a Wikipedia article, there needs to be some reliably sourced political or social or historical context for what makes the bridge distinctive. But with the only source here being a routine directory entry in an indiscriminate database of structures, that isn't the kind of sourcing we require to make the bridge notable. Bearcat (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge per above. No evidence this particular bridge meets notability guidelines, but it is a plausible search term so I think a merge is the best option here. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 00:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.