Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGangBang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 04:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

McGangBang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NN neologism. Of all the sources one barely passes none pass WP:RS Toddst1 (talk) 05:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment:Any meme is a neologism, and this one is particularly well covered in several forms of media. This seems to be an overreaction.  The article firmly establishes the notability of this phenomenon. Whoppavirgin (talk) 05:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: No such WP:Notability established - no Wp:RS. Toddst1 (talk) 05:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Absolute fancruft, garbage article. -Axmann8  ( Talk )  06:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a real product, presented as one. sources do not meet WP:RS, WP:V or WP:PSTS. --Jeremy (blah blah) 06:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Interesting to watch this one develop, but none of the sources hold up. The 'news' source is really doing nothing more than reporting on the existence of the neologism. Fails WP:NN Taroaldo (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable source, all Youtube, blogs etc. Fails WP:NEO. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not an official product, and wouldn't be notable even if it were: it's literally just squishing two sandwiches together. Big whoop. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment A Google news search indicates some coverage, but not enough hard news coverage. There is a column from the Times online March 4, 2009 titled "The fat of the land is back in fashion LA Notebook: may I personally recommend a recession-busting blowout? It's called the McGangBang. Apparently it's been referred to as the "poor man's Turducken". May actually become notable if the buzz continues... ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.