Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGuire Programme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Stuttering therapy. Liz Read! Talk! 03:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

McGuire Programme

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

not notable outside of its community. page was created and is large maintained by those who have had close involvement}} S!mba009 (talk) 23:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Netherlands.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge into Stuttering therapy and close immediately. There is no evidence that this is any more notable than any other treatments, or even notable at all, so right now it is a violation of WP:BLP, WP:SOAP, and most obviously WP:FORK. We almost always merge back forks even if arguendo they might pass WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge into Stuttering therapy as a FORK or unjustified SPINOUT. This kind of fragmentation creates a user experience from hell! gidonb (talk) 01:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with Stuttering therapy: not significant coverage in the sources cited, not strong enough for notability.thus  Password  (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.