Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McKay McKinnon (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

McKay McKinnon
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

American plastic surgeon who fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I think possibly working with the writer to develop a non-promotional stub would be appropriate. I think there is way too much on the page. Or perhaps an article on the surgery which this page redirects to. There seems to be significant coverage of a couple notable surgeries he was involved in. I think the author should also be directed to a list of acceptable references as IMDB and a couple others aren't acceptable. ScienceAdvisor (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. I think he also passes WP:NACADEMIC. See this Google Scholar search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If the subject passes WP:NACADEMIC then that Google Scholar search certainly doesn't show it. There is one co-written paper with 62 citations, one with 15 and a handful with between 0 and 4. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, Although the article needs to be developed by more sources, but successful tumor surgeries ,with coverage, make it notable. Alex-h (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons I stated i AFD1.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:44, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.