Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McKinnon Airpark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

McKinnon Airpark

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Couldn't prod since one had been removed before under the mistaken impression "We have a low inclusion bar for train stations, probably also for small airports". This isn't an airport with facilities for public access or regular flights, it's some rich person's private property with a strip of clear field on which their small private planes can land. No significant coverage; see also essay WikiProject_Airports/Notability Reywas92Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 02:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Some rich person's airstrip isn't worth inclusion unless it meets GNG, which this clearly does not. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing found to satisfy WP:GEOFEAT or WP:GNG. The airfield gets incidental mention in local news media for a 2017 crash there, but nothing substantial about the facility. • Gene93k (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails to meet notability guidelines. Even the local newspapers have few usable results, mostly revolving around an annual Kiwanis Club event.  Sounder Bruce  04:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I have to admit I also question whether every train stop in the middle of no where is notable, but that is another issue for another time. This is more akin to most roads not being notable, but most roads have far more use than this private airstip gets.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly not notable. Private airstrips are not and should not be treated like regular airports. Like what is noted on the notability guidelines on airports, private airstrips have higher bar on notability than other airports. SunDawn  talk  07:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.