Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McLeod Country Golf Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

McLeod Country Golf Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Run of the mill golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose Although I have not been much of a contributor to this article (just a few small edits), I am familiar with the topic as it is in my local area. The significance of this golf club is that it was the first golf club in Australia to give women equal rights and was specifically established by women for that reason. At that time, women could not have full membership of other golf clubs, merely "ladies membership" which generally restrict their rights (could not play on weekends, could not vote, etc). See, , , . However, it would appear that mention of this was removed from the lede paragraph in 2020 by an IP (see this version prior to that edit. I have previously seen IP edits on articles related to Australian women in which bit by bit their achievements are removed or deprecated so this may be the same individual at work. I think the topic is notable (although I would agree that the article wasn't tremendously well-written, but this is not the point at issue in an AfD). Kerry (talk) 04:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG per the sources Kerry Raymond has provided and shows it is not a run-of-the-mill golf course. The complaints department being on the roof is also not a reason for deletion and is non-sensical. Deus et lex (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That is part of 's signature, and is not part of the nomination statement, FWIW.  78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Agree with Kerry's reasons. I've made some copy edits to clean it up a little. There's sufficient sources to pass WP: GNG]. Cabrils (talk) 02:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Relisted in error, sorry. I meant to close as "keep" because the "keep" arguments have remained unrefuted. But now my closing script borks out because of a supposed edit conflicht, so I'll leave this for another closer.  Sandstein   17:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.