Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mckenzie Quotient


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 08:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Mckenzie Quotient

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I've attempted to verify this in the hope that it is real, but can only conclude that it is original research or something made up one day. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. I searched Google (web), LexisNexis (newspapers) and my local univerisity library (journals and books and scientific articles) and found exactly zilch. - Mgm|(talk) 08:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no indication of notability. Edward321 (talk) 15:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, not one Google hit besides own article, looks like a hoax. XLerate (talk) 20:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- as per above. no sources - SimonLyall (talk) 08:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.