Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md Akhtaruzzaman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 23:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Md Akhtaruzzaman
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A paid article tainted by uncertain notability. The assertion of importance in the lead is that he is pro-vice chancellor (administration), in other words one of two deputy vice-chancellors. Criterion #6 of WP:PROF says, "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post".

No independent sources about him are cited. Searches of the usual types finds plenty of "was present" coverage, a smattering of very brief coverage in connection with elections to the executive committee of the Dhaka University Teachers' Association, a brief mention in connection with a national high school textbook committee, and the announcement of his being made pro-vice chancellor, presumably from a press release.

If the community believes he's notable, I'm willing to try to clean up the article. If he's not notable, let's delete it. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Worldbruce said it all; not notable and promotional. -- nafSadh did say 02:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet PROF. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 00:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.