Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md Rokonuzzaman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Md Rokonuzzaman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fail of WP:PROF. Lackluster citation index. nearlyevil 665  10:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  10:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  10:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are several people in GScholar with a similar name but the relevant one appears to be this one. Citability is low, with h-index of only 8. Nothing else to indicate passing WP:PROF. The article is written in a promotional tone. The creator's username, User:Rokon.wiki and the fact that the infobox contains highly personal family details, suggest that we may be dealing with a COI or even possibly WP:AUTO situation here. Nsk92 (talk) 11:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not pass WP:PROF. Mosesheron (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, TOOSOON for NPROF and lacks significant coverage.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 13:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delte Doesn't seem to pass WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.