Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md Sameen Rahman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Md Sameen Rahman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The world record does not make a person notable, and nothing else in the article does either. Note, this has been G11d many times in draftspace - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 16:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople,  and Bangladesh. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 16:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * KeepThe article seems fine to me as he is an entrepreneur and his news articles are quite heavy, and I think he is notable as I can see his company getting featured in some of the biggest journals, and they are pointing him out as an entrepreneur. And speaking of world record it was edited and fixed.
 * Thank you Caspter (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Appears to be entirely promotional, and there is an evident lack of reliable sourcing to back it up. I honestly would've tagged it as WP:G11 if it hadn't been nominated here. CycloneYoris talk! 01:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Crampcomes (talk) 21:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * KeepI don't think the articles appears to be a promotional. I have gone through all the news articles of this individual, and it seems fine to me as all the news is from the respected news desk, so keeping the article would be a wise decision. Forhad alavi (talk) 11:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * My nom is to delete... so how can you !vote "Keep per nom" - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 18:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * More interested to know how an account with seven contributions that hasn't edited in a half-dozen years showed up on an AfD. Also perhaps why above has tried multiple times to create an article for . I guess we could do an SPI, or we could probably just DUCK discount their contributions as an obvious WP:DUCK. Seems someone here may have a farm or a friend.
 * G M G talk  15:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - The subject's "projects" appear to be simply unfishished websites. The Grow More site has exactly one "course" which appears to be a YouTube video, and a couple dozen courses "coming soon". UPGRADE is basically empty aside from the landing page and a bunch of "under construction". These don't seem to be bona fide projects, but rather attempts to pad their resume for anyone who doesn't look too closely. The world record for [insert thing nobody cares about] is neither here nor there. The article here is likely just another attempt at paper-thin self promotion.  G M G  talk  12:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per User:GreenMeansGo. Also clearly COI. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - the Windsor tie world record is pretty cool, but there's no claim to notability in this article. Llajwa (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.