Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadowtown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Meadowtown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources provided for over 2 years. Otterathome (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Added refs. This community is a "Site of Special Scientific Importance" according to the UK government. If you love triblodites, you'll love Meadowtown. Added image. Capitalismojo (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep aside from being covered by multiple reliable sources, the nominator appears to have a grudge with me, and has been hastily trying to exterminate my work, a WP:BATTLE violation. They obviously ignored WP:BEFORE and I believe this is a bad faith nomination.Qxukhgiels (talk) 23:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per sourcing improvements. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.