Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meagan Winings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Nebraska USA.  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Meagan Winings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Winings has won state titles in both the Miss USA and Miss America systems. This alone however is not enough to make her notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Miss Teen USA & Miss USA not Miss America. Curious as to why you didn't just redirect this like the rest of your targets. PageantUpdater (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete As I noted at the recent Articles for deletion/Courtney Barnas (2nd nomination) discussion, I would love to propound even a modest argument for notability with a forceful voice on behalf of any Miss USA state titleholder, but none seems to exist at this time.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a non-notable state-level winner. This does not meet ANYBIO1. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Miss Nebraska USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 16:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project.  No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.