Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mecha!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Mecha!

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable, fails WP:GNG. Another game maybe of the same name (but without the ! appears here), otherwise, searching on Google, Books, News, Scholar, and BGG finds no refs (on BGG, there's only 13 ratings). The concern on if it meets GNG is based on a discussion with  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mecha! here]. But there might be other editors who have some older magazines mentioning this game. Maybe and, frequently involved in BTG articles, AfDs, and discussions, have access to older magazines (if so, many thanks!). VickKiang (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 04:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As noted, I was also unable to find refs to show WP:GNG. In other words, it seems like a very minor, non-notable game. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  07:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * delete. BGG's limited coverage makes me think it is very unlikely this meets WP:N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobit (talk • contribs) 02:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.