Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MedPage Today (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

MedPage Today
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be full of dubious claims that fail verification. Currently has no partnership with the uPenn SoM, and previous partnership was misrepresented; see my comment on :talk and my edits which add twofv tags. User:Jrcla2, did you notice that the citations don't support the content? Elvey (t•c) 22:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of the current article suggests a better notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  02:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is an advertisement and fails GNG above all. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.