Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediBid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

MediBid

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable. Sources are weak. Seems like advertising. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 16:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete There is PR-type coverage of this company's start up, but I think insufficient evidence of attained notability to the WP:CORPDEPTH criteria. The blog source that provides one of the article references starts by calling it "One more site" so it falls short on WP:NWEB too. AllyD (talk) 18:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I could find almost no independent coverage about this company. The few hits I did find at Google News Archive were generally about the founder's political activism rather than about this company. --MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.