Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media5-fone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Media5-fone

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No proof of passing the general notability guideline. I found no Google Books hits. Joy (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 11:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. Joy (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP. Sources are promo and primary, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV. BEFORE showed nothing with SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  07:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: For more input on the sources added by Eastmain. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, when this was first written and proposed for deletion, this was the deprodding diff. No secondary references were added to establish notability there, and the writer turned out to be a classic single-purpose account. We've assumed good faith for almost a decade by now, it's time to paint over the old grafitti. --Joy (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I see citations to business 2 community, Univers Freebox, Root.cz. What are these sources? Do they prove general notability? Are they used in our other articles about software or telecommunications? --Joy (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even with the added sources the article still fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG, and WP:NSOFT. Business2Community is a WordPress blog that uses freelance writers to generate content and does not appear to be a reliable source. This source is about a petition to restore SIP on the Freebox and has nothing to do with Media5-fone, which is only mentioned once in passing in the comments section of that article. While I understand French, the Root.cz article is written in Czech which I do not speak and I do not know if it is a reliable source or not, but from what I can tell through Google Translate the Media5-fone is only mentioned briefly in a short paragraph and in passing in two other places, and looks like a trivial mention. These aren't enough to show notability for the article's subject. - Aoidh (talk) 02:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.