Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaCurves (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

MediaCurves
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

According to a post (made in 2009!) on the talk page none of 28 of the sources actually discuss the company or its impact. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jackattack1597 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I was unable to find significant coverage of this company in the article's citations or online. SailingInABathTub (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of meeting WP:GNG lacks coverage. Impeeriumalo (talk) 12:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.