Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Two


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, blatant advertising. Blueboy96 20:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Media Two

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This could probably be speedied as spam (sole editor User:Mediatwo) but bringing it over to give it benefit of the doubt. Spammy and fairly blatant advertising, and I can't personally see any way it could be cleaned up, and the company doesn't appear to be notable enough in their field to warrant their own entry — although I'm more than willing to be persuaded otherwise. —  iride  scent  18:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. External links are either company's website or unrelated. Tnxman307 (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - G11 and G12. It's spam -- plain and simple.  It's also a copyvio with over half the article directly copied from their homepage.  Granted, the copyright holder almost certainly did the copying themselves, but we can't be assured of that.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 19:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.