Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Worldwide Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR, because the keep !vote following the nomination does not provide a guideline or policy based rationale relative to the rationale of the nomination, nor does the delete !vote following the first relisting. North America1000 11:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Media Worldwide Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a channel, but a business, and NN at that. First GHit is LinkedIn, and it gets worse from there. MSJapan (talk) 08:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Although this topic may not be independently notable and notability is not inherited, deletion would create unnecessary redlinks from notable entities owned by this company. There is nothing untoward in this article and deleting it does not improve the encyclopedia. WP:NORULES. ~Kvng (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. but merge the channels into this. There is no point in creating an article which just links to them; we normally cover the various parts of an organization together unless it becomes too large for this to be practical.  DGG ( talk ) 15:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 01:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * DeleteThis article is just about a website and business so it should be deleted.  Nepali Keto 62 Talk to me 01:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * articles on webistes and businesses are allowed. Do you want to cite a valid WP:DEL-REASON? ~Kvng (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.