Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media determinism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Media determinism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Duplicates technological determinism. The source the article relies on most, McLuhan, doesn't use the term, and I'm not finding sufficient reliable sources to establish notability through use anywhere. Most of the ghits I saw were using it in a synonymous sense with technological determinism. WP:OR, fails WP:GNG, neologism, duplicate. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  15:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck !vote above of blocked sock puppet, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica1000 06:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 06:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Go  Phightins  !  18:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete. Clear violation of copyright. Each sentence is taken, word for word, from the given sources.Paisarepa (talk) 08:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - the term appears fairly often at Google scholar, but not so often in secondary sources. Bearian (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.