Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media news


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Media news
Pointless definition of a wide term. Not even usuable in the Wiktionary. --Kiand 16:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete although a more appropriate article title would be something like Media media (media focused on media) which would be in line with News media (media focused on news) and Mass media (media intended for a wide audience). Peyna 16:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. PJM 16:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could see several ways this could be made useful, but all of them would be nothing but a honeytrap for linkspam. Better to let the page die. ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 17:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, longish dicdef. - Mgm|(talk) 23:21, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; not much point. *Dan T.* 05:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.