Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediastan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. What we need now is for the sources mentioned in this discussion to get into the article. Liz Read! Talk! 03:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Mediastan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE Donald D23   talk to me  03:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Sweden.  Donald D23   talk to me  03:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a review in Aftonbladet, one of the major Swedish newspapers, for example. It's also one of the topics discussed in this longer essay in Arbetaren, discussed in Moviezine and so on. /Julle (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge into another article, this has been flagged for 9 years Softlemonades (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - per sources provided by Julle. Proving notability.BabbaQ (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. At first I was slightly irritated at this nomination, as I had already indicated in an edit summary that I was working on an expansion of the article (for which I already have enough sources). However I am now grateful for the AfD nomination making me aware of Julle and the sources he has provided, removing all doubt about notability. --NSH001 (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Id reconsider if the sources were posted on Talk so I could see them until the article was expanded. I thought you would after your comment before but mightve just assummed Softlemonades (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified by Julle that shows a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.