Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediator (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Mediator (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am unable to find evidence that this was a notable piece of software. A BEFORE only turns up evidence that it existed, which is not in question. Was deleted via PROD in 2008 and subsequently recreated (courtesy ) so I figured better here than at AfD than PROD. Star  Mississippi  21:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  21:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  21:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * delete  The give away clue is on the page itself: "Operating system: 2000, XP, Vista". A few people still remember Windows Vista, but that is why you could not find anyone using it. Grover Cleveland may have been a user, but the software is obsolete now. Ode+Joy (talk) 22:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:N. (though not sure why I got the ping, since I am nowhere in the article history). UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * , sorry that it wasn't clear. You were the one to PROD it in July 2008. Star   Mississippi  01:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, the "deleted history" of myth and legend: a mystery invisible to mere mortal Wikipedians such as I. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:55, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can find this in lots of lists of multimedia software tools, but very little actual coverage that would denote notability. The best I was able to find was this first look capsule item in PC Mag.  This is well short of what is needed to establish inclusion as an article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.