Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medibio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The only reason given for keeping is that an editor thinks it "seems notable enough" without any indication why: see WP:ITSNOTABLE. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Medibio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing sufficient independent sources to support notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * delete per nominators rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep seems notable enough to me, just needs some improvements. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 22:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, the references are either from Medibio itself (and therefore not independent), or routine business news stuff that may or may not just be reheated press releases. The only one I'd consider to be from a decent source is the Hans Stampfer article, which does appear to be a high quality peer reviewed article, but it has the tiny drawback of not mentioning the company.  I do not see how Medibio meets WP:CORP or WP:N at this time.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.